I have been on the road a lot this month! I really enjoyed a workshop with the Virginia Mediation Network in late September on The Alternatives in Alternative Dispute Resolution. In early October I had the pleasure of participating in a symposium on Restorative Justice at the University of Richmond. But today, I’m returning to my series on the options in Alternative Dispute Resolution. Today, I am going to address a few options, in more general terms. Some are early in development, and I have not fully described them. Others involve processes that many practitioners do not include under the ADR Umbrella.Read More
Today, we continue in our review of the alternatives within ADR and will look at restorative justice or restorative practices. My law and mediation practice is based in the principles of restorative justice. Today’s post looks more at a few of the processes often associated with restorative justice that are sometimes used instead of conventional litigation or court processes.Read More
Last week, I returned from the Restorative Practices International conference in St. Paul Minnesota and am frankly swamped at my office! But I want to finish out a post before I forget about the conference, so I'm going to come up with my top five lessons learned at the conference. It's no surprise to me that these tend to involve interaction betweenRead More
I’m putting the finishing touches on my breakout session for the RPI conference next week in St. Paul about restorative lawyering. What’s that? Both Dan Van Ness and Howard Zehr describe restorative justice as being a continuum, with some practices fully restorative and others not at all restorative. Most RJ program practices can be placed someplace on that continuum. I have found that in my everyday practice of law and mediation, my practices may also be placed on that continuum and I work to find the ways to make them more restorative.Read More
Last summer I had a call from the superintendent of schools over in Calhoun County, West Virginia. Superintendent Tim Woodward was frustrated by frequent fights breaking out in the schools and the ineffectiveness of the school discipline system to stop them. He was familiar with restorative justice, having worked in the schools near Harrisonburg, Virginia. County prosecutor, Shannon Johnson, referred Mr. Woodward to me and we brainstormed a while on how we might bring restorative justice to Calhoun County. We found great resources in Kathy Evans, a professor at Eastern Mennonite University who works on RJ in schools, and Jim Nolan, a WVU sociology professor. The four of us collaborated and created a two-day program in January 2017 at the Calhoun County administrative office
This summer, Mr. Woodward accepted an opportunity to move to Hancock County. Meanwhile, Kelli Whytsell, the assistant superintendent in Calhoun was promoted to superintendent. In May, Ms. Whytsell and Mr. Woodward and I put our heads together and decided to create an intensive training on restorative justice at Canaan Valley with teachers and administrators from both systems. Jim Nolan again joined us for the training. We were also joined by Dashiell Quasebarth, a classroom teacher in the Virginia Beach area who uses restorative justice in his classroom.
This was a situation when I learned more than the participants! This enthusiastic, compassionate and experienced group of professionals quickly caught onto the concept that restorative justice focuses on healing the harm after wrongdoing, rather than punishment for punishment's sake. Many of the Calhoun County participants began implementing some restorative practices in January. With that experience came some successes. One of the situations that impressed me most involved two parents who were drawn into a conflict outside of school, but had heard about the restorative circles and asked the school to help them work it out. The Calhoun teachers, administrators, and counselors had experiences with students who experienced a significant transformation in accepting responsibility for their wrongdoing during restorative justice processes.
Most of the Hancock county professionals were new to restorative justice. However, as they learned about the principles and values of RJ, they were able to identify ways how what they are currently doing is consistent with restorative practices. Many easily articulated finding ways to expand these ideas further. Several teachers were excited to learn about the paradigm shift, moving away from punishment towards an outlook that seeks to find what harm was done and then look for ways to make right the wrongs and meet the needs of the offender, victim and the community.
Some teachers struggled with the idea of less authoritarian approach in the classroom. Midway through the training, we did a role play. Participants assumed roles as teachers, administrators, and students, including one very disruptive student who was having trouble learning. During the role play, the participant’s became perspective shifted. Some said that the time we had together had caused them to reexamine the way that they had done things and they were excited and looked forward to a new approach.
My favorite moment of the weekend followed some small group discussions we had about various challenges that we are trying to address with restorative justice. When we reconvened, we formed two circles in a Margolis wheel. Teachers from Hancock County sat on the inside of the circle, and those from Hancock on the outside of the circle as they shared the ideas that were generated from their small group discussions. It was rejuvenating for me to see how such experienced and dedicated teachers could be so excited about bringing RJ into their work.
Many of the participants came into the training thinking that the restorative justice in schools would be another program to invest in, roll out and then replace in few years. However, once they realized that RJ is more a "way of being" that allows the educators to integrate new ways into looking at wrongdoing in the educational environment into their communities.
Tomorrow I will be joining several colleagues as we travel to Calhoun County, West Virginia for two days to meet with community leaders, education professionals, and law enforcement to discuss the potential applications for restorative justice in the community.Read More
On December 7, 2016, I’ll be joining Howard Zehr for a webinar on Restorative Lawyering. Restorative Lawyering is a model of practicing law that I have been developing along with colleagues such as Marshall Yoder and Susan Marcus. Restorative lawyering adopts the guiding principles and values of restorative justice. In doing so, we look at each situation, problem, or conflict and often start by asking, “Has there been harm that needs to be addressed?” and “What can be done to make right the wrongs?” These fundamental questions, central to restorative justice, change the focus from what statute or rule has been violated to what can be done to make things better.Read More
This weekend I will be joining lawyers from all over the United States in Harrisonburg, Virginia to participate in a symposium, “Restorative Justice’s Role in the Expanding Concepts and Structures of the Practice of Law in the United States.” Sponsored by the Campbell University College of Law and the Zehr Institute for Restorative Justice, we will be addressing topics such as “A Trauma-Informed Legal Practice” and “How Restorative Practices are Affecting Systemic Change.” Of course, I am most excited to hear what Professor Zehr will bring to the symposium during Friday night's session, “Restorative Justice: Continuing the Conversation.”Read More